Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Christine's avatar

An update on my last post for you to consider - "when the going gets tough, the Tough get going" Hey that's me:

Schools name and address here Your name and address here

Date

Dear Sirs,

I wish to notify you that you are holding yourself legally responsible for any injuries or deaths caused by your demand that all students are fully vaccinated, before they return to your school and at the next P&C I will bring this point to the attention of all parents, whose children could be adversly affected by your decision to demand that all students be Covid vaccinated, to your requirements, until you retract your letter, in writing, to that effect.

I have notified my Lawyer( Thomas Renz) of my decision to write this letter to you, with the accompanying information for your attention, so that we can begin a class action against your school and its principals, when that becomes necessary, for damages in the millions, which you will be forced to repay, including, of course, the adverse publicity which will go with it, for our kids who are damaged or killed, by your vaccines mandate.

For your information, I enclose the latest update on Covid vaccines:

COVID jab a medical treatment, not a vaccine, “safe and effective for what?”

Legal Precedent - 9th Circuit Court Rules COVID-19 mRNA Injections Are Not Legally Vaccines

"The right to refuse unwanted medical treatment is entirely consistent with this Nation’s history and constitutional traditions and the case merits are sufficient to invoke that fundamental right."

Karen Kingston

Jun 8

June 7, 2024: The 9th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals just ruled in favor of protecting individual human rights and bodily sovereignty of teachers and other staff of the Los Angeles School Unified District’s (LAUSD), reversing a lower court’s dismissal of their case against the LA County’s School District vaccine mandate for employees.

Announcing this huge win on behalf of their clients, Health Freedom Defense Fund issued a press release, stating that the case was won;

“On the merits, the majority ruled that the district court had misapplied the Supreme Court’s 1905 decision in Jacobson v. Massachusetts when it dismissed LAUSD’s lawsuit on grounds that the mandate was rationally related to a legitimate state interest. In Jacobson, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a smallpox vaccination mandate because it related to “preventing the spread” of smallpox.

The majority, however, noted that HFDF had alleged in the lawsuit that the COVID jabs are not “traditional” vaccines because they do not prevent the spread of COVID-19 but only purport to mitigate COVID symptoms in the recipient. This, HFDF had alleged in its complaint, makes the COVID jab a medical treatment, not a vaccine.

The court recognized that mitigating symptoms rather than preventing the spread of disease “distinguishes Jacobson, thus presenting a different government interest.” Based on this reasoning, the majority disapproved the trial court’s contention that, even if the jabs do not prevent the spread, “Jacobson still dictates that the vaccine mandate is subject to, and survives, the rational basis test.”

The court held that “[t]his misapplies Jacobson,” which “did not involve a claim in which the compelled vaccine was ‘designed to reduce symptoms in the infected vaccine recipient rather than to prevent transmission and infection.”’ Jacobson does not, the majority concluded, extend to “forced medical treatment” for the benefit of the recipient.”

When HFDF asked the court to opine as to whether or not the CDC’s claim that the COVID-19 vaccines were ‘safe and effective’, the court responded with the rhetorical question, “safe and effective for what?”

Legal Precedent for U.S. Citizens to Deny Medical Treatment

Per the HFDF press release, “Judge Collins wrote that the district court “further erred by failing to realize that [HFDF’s] allegations directly implicate a distinct and more recent line of Supreme Court authority” for the proposition that “a competent person has a constitutionally protected liberty interest in refusing unwanted medical treatment[.]” Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Washington v. Glucksberg, Judge Collins noted that the right to refuse unwanted medical treatment is “entirely consistent with this Nation’s history and constitutional traditions,” and that HFDF’s allegations in this case “are sufficient to invoke that fundamental right.”

The Kingston Report

A Legal Precedent is a LEGAL "Rule Of Law from God". It cannot be bought or suppressed.

A vaccine which BionTech/Pfizer said should have been licensed as a Gene Therapy Injection (2015) and which targets the Dentric Cells in the Lymph Nodes (2023) - but what for?

ModRNA Made in a laboratory and Patented by US Law 2013 not "Natural mRNA" which by US Law 2013 cannot be patented: mRNA means injected humans are now genetically modified to produce "protein" toxins that their own body tries to destroy

Ever heard the term auto-immune disorder? If not, you will very soon, and quite often. It starts with even the healthiest people, who got brainwashed by the Pharma cartel into getting the toxic "forever" jab, where human cells are tricked into producing virus-mimicking "protein" prions, that are produced indefinitely (counter to medical narratives) and spread throughout the body. This signals the human immune system that every organ is under attack by foreign invaders, and the immune system is taxed, hyper-activated constantly, and the heart and CNS start breaking down too.

Just like GM corn and GM soy, the Covid-jab-injected human's DNA system is now a toxic protein creating factory, but instead of killing insects and worms, the human body is destroying itself. In other words, the "pest" is itself, and the immune system identifies it this way. Still wondering why the Covid-vaxxed masses keep dropping like flies, from unexplainable heart attacks, spontaneous abortions and stroke-inducing fibrous vascular clots?

These mRNA-injected humans are now walking bio-weapons factories, and their doctors are never allowed to discuss it. The medical industry has every employee parroting and regurgitating all the false-narratives (disinformation) about how the mRNA remains at the site of injection, and how it only produces spike proteins for a few months. Lies. Does the genetically modified corn and soy only produce worm-exterminating proteins for a few weeks? This deserves careful consideration.

Do not ever let Big Pharma genetically modify you. There are more mRNA jabs being developed right now, being created to control the populace, eliminate the undesirables (everyone but the elitists and their slaves), and turn the Republic into a third-world hell-hole.

More mRNA coming to further infect 270 million Americans with "protein" toxins that invade every organ, including the heart and brain

S.D. Wells Update June 7 2024

yours faithfully,

Your Name and date it and copy it, on file.

Expand full comment
Sotogirl's avatar

I honestly thought most people were waking up to the ENTIRE vaxCiNe campaign. NOOOOOOO, I got an email from my son's school stating no student could start school unless they have their entire immunization record up to date. WTF??????? I have been using a religious exemption for my son and lately have made copies and handed them out to parents that refuse to vaccinate their kids for anything anymore. (score, me)

The sad thing is most people in this state either don't know about the religious exemption or are against it. I have a feeling more people have gotten these exemptions and they (the state) are firing a warning shot. The dumb bipedal herd animals will probably take their child to the nearest pharmacy and get that death shot because they do not advocate for their own children.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts