This article is about Gold and who owns it and who does not and the simple fact that gold, once used, does not simply disappear, it is stockpiled somewhere
Kamala Harris Reducing the population will enable children to breathe clean air and drink clean water:
This article is about Gold and who owns it and who does not and the simple fact that gold, once used, does not simply disappear, it is stockpiled somewhere and whoever owns that stockpile of gold, controls their country and indirectly the world as a whole - the question is, who owns that stockpile of gold and where is that gold kept?
Banks are funded by the goverment and they hold, or should hold, large gold deposits, but the wealth of a bank is not stiiing on gold, but to invest that gold into the economy and indirectly the people who make loans from the bank, which they repay in mortgages to eventually own the propery or purchase, which they are buying.
More recently, the really clever investors buy property and loan money each year, from the bank to meet their financial repayment payments, keeping their own finanaces liquid to purchase more property and financial assets and increase their market worth, purchase of property is not taxable, only when you sell it, it is.
So the banks fund the mortgage repayments at the cost to the loaner, the interest payments charged by the banks to maintain that propery purchase and possession by the purchaser who has taken the loan out from the bank to do that, based on the value of the property, which the bank will grab, if the person to whom the loan has been made, defaults - the same way that America has to meet its now weekly, or monthly repayment loans to the World Bank on the trillions of dollars given to it, to invest in its infrastruture, in return.
But the problem occurs when the money loaned by the banks is based on the equity value of the building, which before was worth say 355 million in 2006 but now is worth only 8.5 million in 2024, even though the purchaser still has to repay a considerable amount to purchase that building and stil lhas to raise the mortgage repayments on that sum, where the asset value of that building is now 8.5 million, so the shortfall can't be covered and the purchaser goes bust, probably taking the bank down as well, because by defaulting and the bank recovering the building to cover its debt in turn, that loaned amount in its millions, won't be covered by the sale price of the building, by the bank to recover its bebt, for a large part of the original purchase price, which the person who defaulted has to repay, also from their liquid stocks as well.
This happened the last time, when the banks invested in property mortgages raised by home sales agents, who wrote valueless mortgages to people who did not have the necessary income to maintain their mortgages and then these mortgages were sold to the banks as secure investments, which they later proved not to be, so the banks lost the money they paid for the worthless mortgages and went bust, which forced the American government to empty the gold reserves, to support the banks and thus the economy of America for a bit longer, because countries can't go bankrupt, they have to trade themselves out of debt and they do that by increasing interest rates on the money they loan, to try and put gold or property reserves back in their banks.
Commercial property has always been a secure investment, so why not continue that trend - however with computers, technology, AI and automation the offices have emptied as humans have been replaced by machines and working from home and the buildings which once were a great long term investment, no longer are as the 97% reduction in property values in NYC has recently shown - the question this time is, did the banks have the fortitude to invest in gold reserves or not. on behalf of the American government which relies on their support to finance itself and indirectly the military, which needs a constant source of weapons, human power, gas, machinery and goodness knows what, to continue functioning, because the banks are the government and the liquidity of the banks is the liquidity of the government and all services which it provides.
When pensions are awarded or any other government long term payment, the conditions which were prevalent then, form the basis of that payment from that day forward, that those financially supported, by the government payments, can expect to get, while they remain alive.
Legislation is written into those payments, so that when changes occur to the payment method made, in later years forward, those new changes cannot be backdated, so the payment structure remains the same during the life of the person receiving that pension.
The only way that any government can make change on those who are paid established pensions is to force, mandate, or nudge people to do whatever the government wants them to do and if those nudges don't secure the results required, then nothing can be done to change that, by essentially volunteering to have an experimental test vaccine injected, where the recipient suffers the fate of the injection, whatever that might be and not the government paying those pensions, at all - like dying quicker than expected, for example.
Our world revolves around the creation of money and everything is governed by that monsy and who has the most of it and now that everything is going digital, the gold, which can't be made digital, becomes the property of those who have the vaults and other inaccessible places where it can be held and not stolen by someone else, because gold knows no owner and like cash, can be owned by anyone, irrespective of how they got it.
So ultimately, having gold at home where it can be easily stolen, makes no sense and no safe is strong enough, that it can't be broken open or stolen and then broken open to recover that gold for somone new to own - so it makes sense that the only place that gold can be stored is in a bank vault, underground and protected by the latest electronic means - so where the gold value is summarized by its material wealth in a digital format which can be spent by its owners, by the same token, that gold becomes owned by the bank which holds it and because profit is not governed by doing nothing with investments and that gold is now owned and replaced by the bank with a digital currency instead, the bank uses that gold in its possession, to invest and become even more financially viable - the only problem being, when the property investments themselves go bad, everyone suffers if the bank is forced to close and goes bust, as might be the case very soon, because while the people banking with that bank have digital assets, those digital assrts have zero value, if the bank of their choice goes bust, irrespective of if those with accounts with that bank, were rich or poor alike, this time.
So whoever has stockpiled that gold is the true winner and the person or corporation which eventually dictates its requirements to the world and we are near finding out who that is and what their new demands are - like for example reducing humanity down to 250 million by using the 5G signal wave, to change the injected carbon partciles in the injected vaccines into graphene hydroxide nanoscale razors, which chop up the insides of organs and mysteriously kill off the multitude, by some strange new disease, for which there is no cure, because nobody knows what is happening or why - but we do, don't we?
So it all comes back to that gold and who has collected it and what demands they make to share part of it, in return for services rendered, where the sum total of a population is the means by which any government operates and its ultimate purpose, which is to survive on its own merit and fuck the individual you, in order to do so, you did after all, volunteer the fate which befalls you, not hindered by the Law which predetermined that the vaccinated are no longer Human, but a new species with zero Rights of any kind, post Covid vaccines injections, so legally speaking, their deaths are legal and within the Human law, which does not provide any legal cover to the vaccinated, who now are little better than slaves, but once again:
Supreme Court: Pfizer, Moderna et al own your genes once you’re injected with their lab-created mRNA, DNA - Simplification
“The Supreme Court ruled that if there is anything synthetic, not from nature, inside of our genome, then whoever owns the patent on those synthetic parts now owns part or all of you as a human. That means Bill and Melinda Gates, The Department of Defense, [and others] can literally own a human being. If this synthetic code is taken up into your genome, by law, you could be owned overnight.”
The synthetic mRNA of Pfizer and Moderna, along with the viral vector DNA delivery systems of Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca, change your genetic code, making you “genetically-modified.” Granted mainstream media say the foregoing is “conspiracy theory.” But Moderna Chief Medical Officer Tal Zaks tells you straight up that 1) the shots change your genetic code and 2) the shots do not stop the spread of COVID-19. He says the Moderna shot is “hacking the software of life”
Viral vectors do the same thing.
So do these companies “own you” once you get the shots? Well, they own mice and bacteria created with their inventions. Once you get these shots, you are no longer a “naturally-occurring” human being. Prosthetic limbs, breast implants, etc. are not “natural” per se. But they are removable and not part of what fundamentally makes you human. Gene therapy is irreversible. Do the math yourself.
So who paid for the vaccines in the first place and who ultimately owns them? - your government, with the assistance of WHO, Trump, Biden and others - who now own vaccinated you, body and soul, to do with you as they please, since you have zero Legal Rights to suggest otherwise - the government controlled by those who own the gold and what demands they make on existing government, to remain and be able to function, at all.
Is my take on it, my speculation if you like - I wonder if Harris's recent gaffe has anything to do with it, on behalf of the Democrat Party?: Kamala Harris Reducing the population will enable children to breathe clean air and drink clean water:
I'm ahead of Armstrong Economics on this one - I wonder if his take on it is like mine?
For all the emails coming in: I am finishing up this report this weekend
The Real Risk Ahead
Armstrong Economics
Let's say, for the sake of example, that Trump purchased the building in NYC for 355 million in 2006 and that now in 2023/24 he went to his bank and said that he wanted a loan on the value of that building for 500 million which was its worth, fully occupied, which he was going to use to defray his expenses and expenditure, for the court fines made against him, in his recent trials, all which he lost and for Trump to remain open and trading, while trying to become the next American President, then to write off his financial losses and court rulings and financial costs accordingly, which he will do, with the power given him, as President - so slam dunk to Trump - aided and assisted by you who vote him in. Win/Win to Trump.
The bank provided Trump with the 500 million he asked for, at a respective loan repayment scheme of say 3% per annum, but during the repayments schedule, Trump defaulted, the bank grabbed his building and to recover their original investment of 500 million, they sold the property for 8.5 million, a 97% property value reduction, so now the bank is out of pocket for 491.5 million it can't recover or from Trump, who was only involved in the mortgage of that building with the bank - so what is the bank to do to recover the 491.5 million it is out of pocket for, or the interest on that money, which it has lost as well - and if more property parcels default, because the NYC property valuation has dropped 97% across the board by 2024, for loans made by that bank, or any bank, in the millions or trillions, how many more foreclosures does it take for that bank, or any bank, to go bust and take all of its customers down with it, irrespective of if they are wealthy or poor, this time, with an American government which spent all of its gold reserves last time this happened in 2018? and it does not have any gold reserves left now, in 2024.
While this is the scenario for that bank, the same argument could be made of all of the oher banks in America and around the world, where, if the value of commercial property occupancy, has plunged 97% and the banks can't recover the money they paid out in mortgages, for property now worth 3% of what it once was, at the new property occupancy valuation, based on occupancy which generates income the building needs to survive, which the banks did not do, to evaluate the actual real costs of a buildings occupied worth, because of market fluctuations and changes in the way that business is conducted - that impact felt by the customers of that bank, who wake up broke financially, where their bank's financial guarantee, is not covered by their government's investment holdings of gold, which it no longer has.
QED