Did YOU as a person, ever get the feeling you just did not matter in the scheme of things, whether you lived, or died, or were never born?

It is nice to be wanted, by The US DOD, DARPA, your Governments - but what as?

Graphene is used in many products even though research into graphene’s toxicity is very limited

The testing of graphene-derived materials for toxicity has been very limited, and even the limited testing has shown a wide range of potential harms – yet graphene materials are being broadly introduced into different industries and aspects of our lives, from biosensors to conductive surfaces to batteries and face masks.

Due to their unique properties, graphene materials enable the implementation of the indispensable component of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, the wretched Internet of Bodies.

Is Graphene a Cure-All or Glyphosate 2.0?

What Is Graphene?

Graphene is a carbon material with unique and lucrative properties. It’s “a single layer (monolayer) sheet of carbon atoms that are bonded together in a repeating pattern of hexagons.” This sheet is only one atom thick. Monolayers of graphene stacked on top of each other form graphite. Since a typical carbon atom has a diameter of about 0.33 nanometres, there are about 3 million layers of graphene in a 1 mm thick sheet of graphite.

Thanks to the unique structure of graphene, it possesses other amazing characteristics: Its high electron mobility is 100x faster than silicon; it conducts heat 2x better than diamond; its electrical conductivity is 13x better than copper; it absorbs only 2.3% of reflecting light; it is impervious so that even the smallest atom (helium) can’t pass through a defect-free monolayer graphene sheet.

It is considered a new class of materials, the so-called “2D” material. It’s called 2D (arbitrarily, in my opinion) because it’s only one atom thick, and so the scientists decided to measure its height at zero.

It’s the talk of the town. Its inventors won a Nobel prize. It’s harder than steel, it shrinks from heat and expands from cold (which is the opposite of what other materials do), and it is extremely conductive. And again, I would personally be cautiously excited about such a wonder material if it weren’t in the hands of the maniacs who have no respect for my body! I am not a conspiracy theorist; I am a conspiracy realist!

Additionally, there are many graphene-based materials and derivatives with their own unique properties, such as “holey graphene,” graphene oxide, graphene hydroxide, etc. For example:

Graphene oxide (GO) is a single atom carbon layer where both surfaces of the layer are modified by oxygen containing functional groups. In multi-layer graphene oxide, the carbon layers are separated by functional groups bonded to each layer of carbon atoms.

Although GO – like graphene – is a 2D material, its properties are very different from that of graphene. It does not absorb visible light, has very low electric conductance compared to that of graphene, and demonstrates significantly higher chemical activity.

Are Graphene Materials Safe? (Well the US DOD and DARPA and your Government behind the Covid-19 vaccines) seems to think so - otherwise why inject you with graphene particles)

The truth is, we have no idea. It has not been sufficiently tested for toxicity. Where it was tested, the results were mixed – and with that limited testing, it seems like it greatly depended on various factors such as what specific material was used, how it was produced, the size of the flakes, whether there were possible contaminants, and so on.

Some studies talk about neurotoxicity, immunotoxicity, DNA damage, lung damage, and many other alarming outcomes (HERE, HERE, and HERE). I particularly recommend going over the first one since it provides an overview, as of 2016, of different administration routes and mechanisms of toxicity for graphene-family nanoparticles.

Some stories of bringing up the toxicity of graphene materials are tragic. The German chemist Dr. Andreas Noack made a video about the toxicity of graphene hydroxide and how it could cut like a tiny razor blade, and then he was found dead, rumoured to have been murdered.

Some are saying graphene is an amazing weapon against antibiotic-resistant superbugs

(Notably – and I can’t help thinking about it – the World Economic Forum is talking about antimicrobial resistance as the next big health hazard, and if there is one thing in this world that is certain, it’s that they wouldn’t mind us getting sick so that they can profitably “cure” us.)

As an oddity, HERE is a study on improving fertility outcomes in pigs by using graphene oxide to, forgive me, “engineer sperm membrane.” Sounds wonderful. Another idea is to maybe stop messing with nature and let us all reproduce without poisons, but I understand that my idea makes it hard to make a profit, so I apologise, and bring on graphene oxide!

In addition, graphene – as opposed to some of its derivatives – has mad electric conductivity, and the science of today is very arrogant about our bodies’ electric properties, so they are not even looking at that properly, despite the fact that electricity is one of the main languages used by our bodies for internal and external communication.

DDT is so safe you can eat it 1947 (Me: AND DDT causes Polio)

Where Is Graphene Found Now and Potentially in the Future?

Well, everywhere, seemingly – and not just in sensors, antennas, nanotubes, and various medical applications, including some injections.

It’s in facemasks

And in paint.

And in car inferiors.

And in sustainable adhesives.

And in computing.

And in batteries.

And in clothing. See also HERE.

And potentially in energy production.

And in enriching uranium.

And in “biometric soft skin.”

And in heating wallpaper.

And in construction in general.

And in diagnostics.

And in “smart orthodontics.”

And, kind of, in decarbonisation.

And here is a case of grinding used face masks into powder to make better concrete (no comment here).

And a case of spying on the previously unaccountable bacteria.

What about the vaccines?

Advance Vaccine Technology Is Not a Conspiracy Theory

The mainstream media likes to mock the “crazy conspiracy theorists.” But notions like “nanotech in vaccines,” “self-spreading vaccines,” or “graphene oxide in vaccines” are not conspiracy theories but well-documented notions that are talked about in official studies and documents – just not necessarily in the context of the covid injections.

Graphene-Based Materials in Medicine, Including in Vaccines

A 2019 article in Science Daily titled ‘Graphene can hear your brain whisper’ states:

A newly developed graphene-based implant can record electrical activity in the brain at extremely low frequencies and over large areas, unlocking the wealth of information found below 0.1 Hz.

A 2021 paper titled ‘Intranasal vaccination with influenza HA/GO-PEI nanoparticles provides immune protection against homo- and heterologous strains’ that talks about a new investigational intranasal influenza vaccine with graphene oxide states:

Two-dimensional (2D) graphene oxide (GO) nanoparticles have great potential as a novel vaccine platform due to their extraordinary attributes.

And while we are being conspiratorial, um, sorry realistic, let’s briefly touch upon the crazy topics of self-assembling vaccines and nano-sized communicational networks, some of which, not all but some, use graphene materials.

Self-Assembling Nanoparticle Vaccines

Here is a 2018 brochure by the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (“NIAID”) Vaccine Research Centre (PDF HERE). They are talking about self-assembling nanoparticles as a mechanism used in new influenza vaccines.

Here is a 2019 ‘Testimony before the House Committee on Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations‘ by no other than Anthony Fauci (PDF HERE). He is talking about self-assembling nanoparticle vaccines!

HERE is from Rice University- not in the context of vaccines though – ‘Nanotubes assemble! Rice introduces ‘Teslaphoresis’’ which states:

These nanotube wires grow and act like nerves, and controlled assembly of nanomaterials from the bottom up may be used as a template for applications in regenerative medicine … There are so many applications where one could utilise strong force fields to control the behaviour of matter in both biological and artificial systems.

A 2019 article, titled ‘Aerosolised Nanobots: Parsing Fact from Fiction for Health Security – A Dialectical View’ states:

Nanoscalar robotics can be used as both sensors and receiver-delivery devices, and the controllability of these technologies enable their directed activity in biological organisms. Such devices – either operating in tandem as distinct sense-and-engage systems, or as single devices with both sense and delivery modes – could be employed to assess, respond to, or modify molecular and chemical characteristics of a biological target.

As recent studies have indicated, these approaches can be used in clinical care to more precisely monitor tissue, organ, and overall bodily states and to alter the structure and function of biological tissues and systems at a variety of scales, from the subcellular to the systemic and organismic.

A 2015 paper out of Forth Institute of Computer Science in Greece, titled (I kid you not) ‘CORONA: A Coordinate and Routing system for Nanonetworks’. The paper is about a topology of nano communication networks potentially for use inside living beings:

Advances in nanotechnology enable the development of tiny machines from nanoscale components, namely nanomachines. Composed of a power supply, a memory, an antenna and a CPU module, nanomachines are entirely autonomous nodes which are able to perform simple operations and communicate in short distances.

Currently, miniature graphene based antennas are introduced giving nanomachines the ability to achieve high transmission rates over very short distances when operating in the most promising operating spectrum of Terahertz Band. Such networks are expected to be widely deployed in a variety of fields, such as biomedicine, industry, environment and the military.

Communication among nanomachines is evolving in the direction of ad-hoc networks due to their characteristics: the ability to be reconfigurable and self-organised. However, the severe restrictions of nano-nodes in terms of computational power, memory and energy, combined with the expected high number of nano-nodes per network, give rise to different protocols and networking design issues.

The key challenge in nano-architectures and protocols is to maintain simplicity without compromising the connectivity and lifetime of the nanonetwork. [Emphasis added]

HERE is a Harvard Magazine article from 2011 which states:

Imagine being able to signal an immune cell to generate antibodies that would fight bacteria or even cancer. That fictional possibility is now a step closer to reality with the development of a bio-compatible transistor the size of a virus.

Hyman professor of chemistry Charles Lieber and his colleagues used nanowires to create a transistor so small that it can be used to enter and probe cells without disrupting the intracellular machinery. These nanoscale semiconductor switches could even be used to enable two-way communication with individual cells.

And HERE’s an article from Science that states:

More recently, Lieber’s Harvard lab has shifted gears to integrate nanowires with biology. In 2017, for example, he reported creating soft, flexible 3D nanowire mesh that could be injected into the brains or retina of animals, unfurl and wrap around neurons, and eavesdrop on the electrical communication between cells.

50 billion viral vectors for AstraZeneca - Astrazeneca now "withdrawn"

40 billion LNPs for Moderna

and likely 10 to 12 billion for Pfizer

Per vaccine shot and for the sum of your natural life. Pfizer 3 shots = 36 Billion

viral vectors Read graphene particles

And now the US DOD and DARPA want us all to have carbon nanoparticles and nanotubes in our bodies (these Covid-19 vaccines content) and you have to ask yourself why:

Scientists have published an urgent review of the Covid-19 injections in which they claim to have discovered nanotechnology and Graphene Oxide in both the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA injections, and both the AstraZeneca and Janssen viral vector injections. The new review backs up the findings of numerous other scientists from around the world.

NanoGrafi are pretty much crowing about their nanotubes, now injected into everyone who had a vaccine.

The theory is that when the billions of nanotubes in each vaccine shot are hit with a signal within a certain range by 5G, the nanotubes all vibrate together and emit a sound which kills all thought in the Human Brain and makes the body a Robot or Zombie, controlled by a computer somewhere, presumably for further genetic modification at an mRNA factory near you

The vaccines "probable" sole purpose was to install genetic computers and Plug In's and upgrades and improvements changing the blood so that the supply to the body organs continues after the "soul" of the body has been removed or replaced by a genetic computer interface connection by 5G.

Doctor Discovers the Vaccinated Emit Electromagnetic Signals & Bluetooth Identification Codes August 2, 2022

So those 5G Cell towers going up like mushrooms, have another purpose, don't they. Who never wanted to be a Zombie or a Robot controlled by 5G transmissions?-

Needless to say, the Cell Towers are the weak link in the chain, because without them, there won't be any mobile phones or a vaccinated person who behaves like a Zombie or a Robot controlled by 5G transmissions = Molotov Cocktail and 30 seconds of your spare time to disable them.

Studies from the University Of Almeria in Spain conclude that the vaccines + Graphene + 5G = Brain Control.

(Me: NanoGrafi Company (check them out on Google) developed an intranasal Covid vaccine and PCR Tests with nanoparticles which make graphene nanotubes.

At 5G frequencies of 42.6 Hz per second, the 1.2mm nanotubes injected into the vaccines resonate and propagate a high energy signal at the average speed of human thought., the precise nanotube length of 1.2 nanometers of 1.2×10.9m

The average neuron sends signals at about 180 km/h

When combined, these factors would increase the speed to 432 km/h

Some humans think faster than others so there is a lot of variation.

So with the average thought speed of 180 km/h that is, 180,000 meters over 3,600 seconds: 50 meters per second.

This wave speed of the human brain is achievable for ordinary nanotubes and frequencies radiated by 5G antennas – this is not speculation but science and combined techniques and fits a precise physical formula which is incontestable.

These graphene nanotubes are injected with the vaccines and act on the microwaves emitted by a 5G antenna at the same frequency that human beings think, so through these nano particles, 5G antennas can modify the thoughts of those vaccinated.

Like Robots or Zombies, controlled by 5G Transmissions - and more

Android 5 phone (if vaccinated)inPersona.apk to find your MAC address or Apple iPhone Try An app called BT Inspector, but you have to be in a room away from other devices or get someone to scan your body independently.

Top Scientists prove Graphene Nanobots in COVID Vaccines are Shedding from the Vaccinated to the Unvaccinated

Hidden within the depths of COVID-19 vaccines, an enigma awaits discovery: graphene nanobots. These microscopic entities, composed of graphene oxide, possess a dark agenda that threatens human health and autonomy.

In the vast landscape of scientific advancements, one enigma stands out: graphene nanobots. These microscopic entities, crafted from the extraordinary material known as graphene, have captivated the imaginations of researchers and innovators worldwide. Yet, behind their seemingly miraculous potential lies a disturbing and ominous reality—one that could shape the future of humanity in unforeseen and treacherous ways.

Graphene, a single layer of carbon atoms arranged in a two-dimensional lattice, possesses remarkable properties that have paved the way for revolutionary breakthroughs in various fields. Its strength, flexibility, and conductivity make it a coveted material for applications ranging from electronics to medicine. However, the integration of graphene into nanobots takes this technological marvel to a whole new level.

These minuscule robots, driven by the power of nanotechnology, possess the ability to navigate the intricate terrain of our bodies with unprecedented precision. Their potential applications appear endless: targeted drug delivery, tissue repair, disease detection, and even neural interfaces. But as with any profound technological advancement, questions arise about the potential risks and unintended consequences that may accompany these seemingly remarkable creations.

One concerning aspect of graphene nanobots lies in their potential for infiltration and manipulation. As they navigate through our bloodstream, these microscopic agents have the capacity to interact with our cells, tissues, and even our DNA. The prospect of intentional manipulation or unintended side effects raises alarms about the invasion of our bodily autonomy and the potential for irreversible harm.

Furthermore, the implications of the widespread deployment and utilization of graphene nanobots in society are shrouded in ambiguity. The possibility of surreptitious surveillance, tracking, or alteration of our physical and cognitive functions becomes a disconcerting reality. As these nanobots become more integrated into our daily lives, the line between human agency and technological control blurs, giving rise to a dystopian world where our very essence is manipulated and exploited.

The enigma of graphene nanobots deepens as questions emerge about who holds the power to create and control these microscopic entities. Are they solely in the hands of benevolent scientists and innovators striving for the betterment of humanity?

We can trust our Governments and The Military can't we - with billions so far killed off from these vaccines because their Genetic makeup was not suitable for Genetic Modifications - anybody got a better idea on that?

Well the really good news is that the graphene particles in the Covid vaccines really work against Covid: ARR 1.3% efficient for the AstraZeneca–Oxford, ARR 1.2% for the Moderna–NIH, ARR 1.2% for the J&J, ARR 0.93% for the Gamaleya, and ARR 0.84% for the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccines.

RRR 95% for Pfizer's ARR 0.84%

Pfizer 0.84% Effective. Covid 99.16% Effective.

Dr. Piero Olliaro of Oxford University led the team that produced the new Lancet report: .

Relative risk reductions give a percentage reduction in one group compared to another. These can be misleading and over-exaggerate how helpful something is (RRR - Pie in the sky)

Absolute risk reductions give the actual difference in risk between one group and another. These are usually a lot less sexy but give a more realistic picture of how likely someone is to benefit from a given treatment (ARR - Fact)

So we know that the Covid-19 vaccines were never about Covid don't we (like Duh!!) - their actual purpose is for a much darker secret which the US DOD and DARPA and our Governments have so far, forgot to tell us about - and we won't discuss the murder of billions so far, whose bodies were not compatible with the graphene injections, will we - in line with "their" Great Reset?

Do you remember the article I posted about we Humans having evolved as far as we can and that to evolve further, we have to be part computer and part human - the brains the computer and the arms and legs the human, sounds about right and what controls the overall package, why a super computer of course - silly me?

Just Saying?

By Rhoda Wilson on February 23, 2024 Base Story, Updated by Tessa Lena AND finally updated by me!!