Covid "Vaccine" DNA Integration Into Ovaries Chromosomes 19 & 12 Is Now Confirmed! Lying Health Ministers, CDC, W.H.O. OH MY!
Crimes Against Humanity Case Phase 1
Crimes Against Humanity Case Phase 1 Starts At The Same Time We Learn That Covid "Vaccine" DNA Integration Into Ovaries Chromosomes 19 & 12 Is Now Confirmed! Lying Health Ministers, CDC, W.H.O. OH MY!
WHO's going to be first to fall? WHO is. Thats WHO. Why? Because their vaccine pre qualification program allowed the toxic experiments on genome to be on the global market and advised nations buy it
Interest of Justice
Feb 27, 2024
Here is how Kevin McKernan’s colleague Dr. Janci Lindsay described it when asked today:
Dr. Janci Lindsay: This means that the DNA from the plasmid from the vaccines is integrating into the host genome (THE HOST DNA) of the HUMAN CELL LINE.
It means that DNA integration of the spike protein sequence from the vax has been shown in a human ovarian cell line by chromosomes 19 and chromosome 12.
IOJ asked: Is it proof of getting into the germ line for future generations like Ladapo is concerned of?
Dr. Janci Lindsay replied: This is proof that this could be happening
IOJ asked: Is it reproducible?
Dr. Janci Lindsay replied: They have reproduced it but not other labs yet
We asked for a layman’s explanation and evidence for the Attorneys (really we do a lot of the work too) and she sent us the following which is very understandable that it’s urgent.
This is the lay language:
1) Pfizer Vax DNA is integrating into the human genome of ovarian cell lines.
Ulrike Kaemmerer and Kevin McKernan have shown DNA integration of genetic sequences from the Pfizer mRNA vaccine adulterated with DNA plasmids used to make the vaccines and present in all vials tested across the globe, in a human ovarian cell line. Vax DNA integration into human chromosomes 9 and 12. Integration will cause cancers through insertional mutagenesis and this was a known risk of gene therapies previously.
2) Pfizer vax plasmid SV40 promoter and origin of replication are found in high copy number and through 2 passages of cells (being passed on genetically)
The high amount of spike DNA and protein found in the cells indicates that the DNA is being replicated in the human cells because the manufacturer added a humanSV40 promoter sequence with an origin of replication (ORI) which was not needed. Also not needed to grow the plasmid in bacteria is the human SV40 nuclear targeting sequence (NTS) which takes the vax DNA straight to the nucleus where it can then be inserted—note that bacteria do not have nuclei so this sequence would not be needed to just make copies of the plasmid in E. Coli as they asserted. . This shows intent to integrate the adulterating DNA sequences. Note that language was added to the FD & C code under 21 CFR 360 bbb-3a that specifically allows these “medical countermeasures under EUA authorization” to be both “adulterated and misbranded” and still be deemed fully approved and licensed under FDA approval. The plasmid DNA with the spike sequence is replicating within the cells even though they said this could not happen. This means the DNA limits are superfluous as if the DNA can replicate the DNA limit has no basis. The SV40 virus is highly oncogenic and no genetic sequences of this virus would typically be allowed in any shots, none the less those that can self-replicate.
3) The modified mRNA is causing for additional proteins to be made besides just the viral spike protein through off-target translation and ribosomal “sticking” causing frame shift mutations. It is not possible to predict what proteins or parts of proteins will be made. This CANNOT be allowed. You cannot inject a gene therapy that makes unknown gene products into anyone especially children.
References:
Power point to ICS presentation in Washington DC Feb 25, 2024 https://mega.nz/file/VcolSLpa#1t41sEaLJ6-uqDLeKIRaqDHDTXnyrZF9LJintytAe00
Nepetalactone Newsletter
Vaccine targeted qPCR of Cancer Cell Lines treated with BNT162b2
Ulrike Kaemmerer has treated MCF7 and OvCar3 cancer cell lines with various vaccines. Once transfected they performed cell passaging on these transfected cell lines to dilute out the residual vaccine and identify cells which were transfected. They performed Immunohistochemistry (IHC) on these cells and documented spike expression levels…
Thank you, Senator Johnson, very much appreciate you giving us audience. Many in this audience I have been subjected to years of censorship on this topic. What I want to talk to you today is about the DNA contamination that our team at medicinal genomics discovered in the mRNA vaccines. We're specifically speaking about Pfizer and materna. In this case, this work has been replicated by many labs around the world. And now the FDA, the EMA and even Health Canada has admitted to this. The regulatory agents have admitted that Pfizer also omitted the SP 40 sequences that are in their vaccine. They've deemed this contamination to be of little consequence claiming the DNA is of too little concentration to matter or to be containing DNA have no functional consequence. These statements are false and are not supported by any independent testing by these regulators. After the regulators have admitted to being deceived, they asked the opinion of the party that deceived them how bad was the deception? They shockingly believe the answer they were given, which is that these sequences have no relevance to plasmid manufacturing. As someone who has worked on the Human Genome Project manufacturing millions of plasmids, I can assure you that this is an overt lie. DNA contamination can lead to insertional mutagenesis this is actually declared in Madonna's own patents regarding mRNA vaccines, this is US Patent 10,000,008 98574. This is also supported by limb at all which speaks to the rate of spontaneous integration in the genome during transfection. We are using transfection. After all with LLPs. The SP 40 DNA is in fact functional. It is published as a potent gene therapy tool and a new killer targeting sequence as described by David dean at all. Yes before the promoter DNA is also known to bind to the tumor suppressor gene known as p 53. This is described by dreaming at all the DNA contains the promoter for the antibiotic resistance gene and this plasmid as well. No plasmid manufacturing can occur without a promoter of antibiotic resistance gene so it is clearly functional and key to plasmid manufacturing. Despite the FDA has comments on this topic. The DNA quantity in many vials is over the 10 nanograms per dose limit, but it does vary substantially between lots when we use both qPCR and fluorometry. These differences, these two tools give us different answers that should be concerned that they're allowed to cherry pick between these different tools. Return his own patents US Patent 10 million 077439 teaches that qPCR underestimates the quantity of this contamination and the DNA regulators are once again allowing them to cherry pick between these different measurement tools. DNA guidelines used to be 1000 fold lower before the NCBI Act was established, which provided liability protection for pharmaceutical companies. The limits were devised based on the 10 Minute halflife of DNA in the blood naked DNA in the blood. This DNA contamination is not naked, it's protected and lipid nanoparticles which delivers this DNA to cells which arguably have limits set to ones prior to the nCVA. We have since found Pfizer lots one f 1042 A that are at least 10 fold over any lot we've measured before with qPCR, which is known to underestimate this quantity. For those not familiar with PCR, you may have received CT scores of 35 that will called you positive for COVID. We're seeing CT scores of 13 on the DNA that you're injecting into children. We've applied these vaccines system cancer cell lines and have evidence that it enters the cell and can survive several cell divisions. We have preliminary evidence although this requires replication other labs that this DNA can integrate into into the genome we found to spike sequence integration events and ovarian cancer cell lines of car three into chromosome 12 and 19. Very recently, since these vaccines were expected to only contain mRNA, they were never assessed for genotoxicity studies. These studies were therefore being conducted as guinea pigs US citizens, as we witnessed an unprecedented rise in cancer drug sales since the vaccines rolled out. In summary, the vaccine manufacturers own patents teach that the methods being used to monitor this DNA are not fit for purpose. Their patents teach the insertional mutagenesis risks present in LMP based mRNA vaccines. The only people who are in denial of these facts are the regulators who are routinely hired to work for these very pharmaceutical companies. To have these regulators resigned over the ones on approval of these vaccines for young patients who do not benefit from them. It is time for our representatives to repeal will review the Paducah act of 1992. This Act allows regulators to defray the costs of regulation by accepting payments directly from the companies they regulate. Over half of the FDS budget is sourced through this act. They cannot be voted into office they cannot be voted out but they can approve dangerous library free mandated vaccines. These policies have harm the public toward our country part as immune nurses are forced to choose between their jobs and useless and even dangerous vaccines. In a contamination is not part of any informed consent process in many universities, no mandate the shots based on the guidance and approval of regulators who have become nothing less than a marketing division of the companies they regulate. Thank you for the time
That is that's a very good point. I'm glad you brought that up. So those regulations were written when vaccines were grown in eggs and in other cell cultures where the contaminating DNA was genomic DNA of the cell line that was present in the in the vector or the host. This is very high copy number of DNA of a gene therapy vector, which has these nuclear targeting sequences and has DNA in that replicates inside of a million cells. So when it gets into the cell, it can make more of itself, that's a very different contamination than what they considered when they wrote those 10 anagram regulations. They also wrote those 10 anagram regulations under the pretense of a 10 minute halflife of naked DNA in the blood, and we now have that DNA protected and lipid nanoparticles. And of course, they have raised those guidelines over the last decade 1000 fold. So we've really come to I think the end of the road of how much DNA we can tolerate. Considering the tools we have to monitor and measure this our have never been faster, better, cheaper.
You mentioned the term HalfLife. One thing I don't think we've brought up yet, is how long this mRNA is lasting in the body. Again, we were told we assumed this was going to stay in the arm and be dissolved because mRNA was just so delicate that it was going to be you know, not present the body past couple days. But now we have studies it's been in the body for at least two months. And we haven't started beyond that correct. And yeah, just address that and have a component of this DNA contamination it does. (6 months and throughout the body deliberately)
So many of the studies that are looking at this, I'll name a few krausen at all looked at this in the heart and found that 30 days out in the heart, Hannah at all found this in breast milk. I think they went out a week on that study. castriota looked at this and plasma was out 20 days. And I think outside of that were recently seeing it in in pregnant women inside of placenta, which is a real serious concern. We many of those studies do not differentiate between RNA or DNA. So it could be a combination of both of these things that are contributing to that signal. But DNA is certainly more stable than RNA. They have made modifications to this RNA that makes it last longer, but I think the verdict is still out as to which one has more longevity. We're gonna thank you, Mr. McKernan
Interest of Justice
Me: In 2013, The US Supreme Court passed a Law that when a vaccine changes a person's DNA they are no longer Human and all Human Rights are lost.
They are, for want of a simple explanation like Cattle with the same Rights that Cattle have = none at all - so how did "they" know in 2013 of the vaccine in 2021-24, which did just that?
Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine alters Human DNA By The Exposé on October 22, 2022
A Swedish study has demonstrated and confirmed that the mRNA in the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid injections infiltrates cells and transcribes its message onto human DNA within 6 hours, altering our own DNA.
mRNA “vaccine” experiment does alter human DNA and may (does) pass genetic code from parent to child, warns Dr. McCullough 01/25/2023 / By Lance D Johnson
Confidential Pfizer document shows the company observed 1.6 million adverse events covering nearly every organ system
Over 10,000 categories of nearly 1.6 million adverse events – many of them serious and debilitating – brought to you by Pfizer!
Not mRNA but ModRNA - made in a laboratory and not normal, by nature, to any other life form on this planet, meaning what, when the vaccinated die, with respect to their Souls and their Religon?
mRNA = modRNA = fact lab-created hybrids known as modRNA
Massive "unintended consequences" in the 3300 billion lines of genetic code that make up humanity.
Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Utilizes Nucleoside-Modified Messenger RNA (modRNA) Technology not mRNA, Pfizer Documents Reveal
by Jim H?ft Aug. 20, 2023 8:20 pm258 Comments
Lawyer Tom Renz has exposed that the COVID-19 vaccines, widely advertised as mRNA (messenger RNA) vaccines, are in fact lab-created hybrids known as modRNA.
But the point I make is that for the vaccinated, it has already been done and it can't be undone.
ARR 1.3% efficient for the AstraZeneca–Oxford, ARR 1.2% for the Moderna–NIH, ARR 1.2% for the J&J, ARR 0.93% for the Gamaleya, and ARR 0.84% for the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccines.
Pfizer 0.84% Effective. Covid 99.16% Effective.
Dr. Piero Olliaro of Oxford University led the team that produced the new Lancet report: . thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(21)00069-0/fulltext#%20
You probably think that there cannot be many carbon nanotubes in the vaccine injection you volunteered to have, after all, the size of the injection was not very big, so what harm in that?
50 billion viral vectors for AstraZeneca - Astrazeneca now "withdrawn"
40 billion LNPs for Moderna
and likely 10 to 12 billion for Pfizer
Per vaccine shot and for the sum of your natural life. Pfizer 3 shots = 36 Billion
A Pfizer Document the FDA Tried to Hide Shows LNPs from COVID-19 Vaccine Travel Everywhere in the Body It’s very bad to have LNP in the liver, ovaries, spleen, and more...
Aaron Siri May 23
Moderna is suing Pfizer for patent infringement is that Moderna helped to create the Covid-19 virus as early as 2013 during gain of function research and then patented parts of the virus. This means Moderna essentially owns SARS-CoV-2.
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Over 1,200 emails released under open records requests reveal that the U.S. military is now the top funder and influencer behind a controversial genetic extinction technology known as “gene drives” – pumping $100 million into the field. The trove of emails, obtained via open records requests, also shed light on a $1.6 million dollar UN gene drive advocacy operation paid for by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Pentagon is researching gene editing, Internet of Bodies & AI to enhance human performance: RAND
funding research into creating super humans that are smarter, faster, and stronger through human performance enhancement
In a new hour-long presentation – watch it here: https://sensereceptornews.com/?p=15980 – Latypova lays out the copious evidence she has compiled – including “receipts” – to show that covid injections are nothing more than a bioweapon that was unleashed on the world by the United States Department of Defense (DoD) via the corrupt U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Me: With the assistance of all of you who volunteered to have them.
Supreme Court: Pfizer, Moderna et al. may own your genes once you’re injected with their lab-created mRNA, DNA
“The Supreme Court ruled that if there is anything synthetic, not from nature, inside of our genome, then whoever owns the patent on those synthetic parts now owns part or all of you as a human.
Is it Possible to Patent “Synthetic mRNA” Genetically-Modified Humans? According to the 2013 US Supreme Court Law, With World Wide Application (GMO Products) Yes – the same year 2013, Moderna patented their created Covid virus.
By Rhoda Wilson on October 24, 2022
Moderna Jabs Increase Likelihood Of COVID Infection Over Time
the mRNA shot’s efficacy against BA.2, BA.4, and BA.5 “went negative after 150 days,” while against BA.1.12.1, “became negative after 91 days.” (No natural immunity)
The new "Old Age" according to Medscape is 40 Plus
This is an extermination policy and Deagles has forecast a rapid reduction of 75% populations World Wide by 2025 - 18 months away - how do you think they will achieve that if vaccines are not killing
But potentially How?
Scientists suspect Covid Vaccines contain Graphene & Nanotech that is damaging the Immune System & causing Cancer
Scientists have published an urgent review of the Covid-19 injections in which they claim to have discovered nanotechnology and Graphene Oxide in both the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA injections, and both the AstraZeneca and Janssen viral vector injections. The new review backs up the findings of numerous other scientists from around the world.
new science reveals how 5G cell tower signals can activate "payloads" carried by graphene oxide inside the body, deploying drugs or chemical weapons via remote activation. Brighteon
5G REMOTE KILL VECTOR: Science paper reveals cell phone signals can activate the release of biological PAYLOADS from graphene oxide injected into the body 09/14/2023 // Mike Adams
The vaccines "probable" sole purpose was to install genetic computers and Plug In's and upgrades and improvements changing the blood so that the supply to the body organs continues after the "soul" of the body has been removed or replaced by a genetic computer interface connection by 5G.
Studies from the University Of Almeria in Spain conclude that the vaccines + Graphene + 5G = Brain Control - or a kill switch by computer control.
(Me: NanoGrafi Company (check them out on Google) developed an intranasal Covid vaccine and PCR Tests with nanoparticles which make graphene nanotubes.
These graphene nanotubes are injected with the vaccines and act on the microwaves emitted by a 5G antenna at the same frequency that human beings think, so through these nano particles, 5G antennas can modify the thoughts of those vaccinated.
The theory is that when the billions of nanotubes in each vaccine shot are hit with a signal within a certain range by 5G, the nanotubes all vibrate together and emit a sound which kills all thought in the Human Brain and makes the body a Robot or Zombie, controlled by a computer somewhere, presumably for further genetic modification at an mRNA factory near you
Android 5 phone (if vaccinated) to find your MAC address or Apple iPhone Try An app called BT Inspector, but you have to be in a room away from other devices, or know the MACs of the other devices - Android inPersona. The computer on the other end of 5G, turns itself on and off randomly, but are your thoughts really your own?