Arguments for Halting Covid-19 Vaccines
I fear its not the vaccines, but what's in them, which will be the extermination of those who had them - the Graphene Oxide particles and the nanotechnology from them
Arguments for Halting Covid-19 Vaccines
Feb 26
We’ve put together an intermediate summary of evidence for those who are interested in halting the Covid-19 injections among the population, especially children. We’ve dispelled the notion that the Covid-19 injections are ‘safe & effective’ as advertised.
The following information is indisputable and would qualify as evidence in any legitimate court hearing. It should be noted that the data provided below is merely scratching the surface of what we’ve uncovered and should, in no way be misconstrued as the sum of available data.
I’m sure the ‘fact checkers’ will attempt to discredit, undermine or minimize the data presented as it certainly goes against the prescribed narrative. Before Covid, getting a ‘second opinion’ used to be wise standard practice - now it just gets you labeled ‘anti-vaxxer’ and shouted down. Whether they choose to accept it or not, this is what some experts are saying and it’s concerning enough to warrant - at minimum - a pause on the Covid-19 injections.
Thank you for reading Tom Renz’s Newsletter. This post is public so feel free to share it.
🪓TRUTH: Vaccines are Unavoidably Unsafe
We know that the Covid-19 injections are not actually vaccines - but since they’ve been marketed to the public as such -the following information is necessary.
The vaccine industry got immunity from liability by convincing the President and Congress that vaccines are ‘unavoidably unsafe’. As such, the court takes as true the premise that vaccines are unavoidably unsafe. Since the government mandates the use of an unavoidably unsafe product, it is reasonable to believe that some people will be injured by it. Therefore, the assertion that Covid-19 vaccines are ‘safe’ is patently false.
42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa-22(1).
On February 22, 2011, the Supreme Court upheld this when they ruled on Bruesewitz v. Wyeth, a case involving the scope of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. They considered whether 42 U.S.C. Section 300aa-22(b)(1) of the act precludes all vaccine design defect claims even if the vaccine’s side effects were avoidable, or whether the vaccine manufacturer has to show on a case-by-case basis that the side effects could not have been avoided by some alternatively designed vaccine.
They held that the Vaccine Act expressly preempts all design defect claims against manufacturers.
‘Unavoidably Unsafe’: RFK Jr. Reveals the Untold Truth Why Vaccines Have Liability Protections
“And so, anybody who tells you vaccines are safe and effective, the industry itself got immunity from liability by convincing the President and Congress that vaccines are unavoidably unsafe.” -Robert Kennedy Jr.
🪓TRUTH: It’s Not a Vaccine - It’s Gene Therapy
The mRNA Covid-19 injections are not vaccines. They are gene therapy products.
On page 148 & 149 of Moderna’s 2019 SEC filing there is a legally mandated discussion of “risk factors” that reads as follows:
“No mRNA drug has been approved in this new potential class of medicines and may never be approved as a result of efforts by others or us. mRNA drug development has substantial clinical development and regulatory risk due to the novel and unprecedented nature of this new class of medicines.
As a potential new class of medicines, no mRNA medicines have been approved to date by the FDA or other regulatory agency… currently mRNA is considered a gene therapy product by the FDA.”
mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Should Be Labeled Gene Therapy Products: Peer-Reviewed Paper (published June 9, 2023):
“The prime reaction of an mRNA vaccine is that it instructs the body how to make the antigen of interest. So, it’s similar to a prodrug, which is converted inside the body via metabolism and enzymes into the desired drug effect. The substance you’re injecting isn’t doing the final action; it leads to the thing that does the final action. With a prodrug, the molecule you inject does not get changed into the final molecule of the antigen, it simply provides instructions because it’s gene therapy.” Since Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines meet the definition of gene therapy, they should be handled according to gene therapy guidelines.”
The March 2015 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the FDA and the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research published a ‘guide for industry’ entitled: “Determining the Need for and Content of Environmental Assessments for Gene Therapies, Vectored Vaccines, and Related Recombinant Viral or Microbial Products” lists their definition of gene therapy.
It’s been reported that lobbyists for BioNTech & Moderna are active in European Parliament, seeking to redefine gene therapy as it relates to mRNA vaccines.
Gene therapy products require a much more stringent regulatory process and the FDA guidance for industry documents that we’ve discussed in depth, prove that GTP’s have the potential to integrate into the host genome and wreak havoc on the body.
They have the potential to effectuate ‘altered expression’ of the host’s genome, shed on others, produce undesirable biologic events & delayed adverse reactions - including autoimmune issues, malignant transformation (cancer) and death. The longer they are in the body, the more potential for damage. It was deceptive to market these injections as vaccines when they are gene therapy products. This is a violation of proper informed consent and the Nuremburg Code.
🪓 TRUTH: Pfizer Did Not Know Whether the Covid Vaccine Stopped Transmission Before Rollout
🪓 TRUTH: Pharma Knew the Covid-19 Injections Would Harm People
Former VP of Pfizer Confirms Pharma Knew the Shots Would Be Toxic
Sasha Latypova published a leaked audio recording that allegedly exposes an AstraZeneca internal executive meeting that took place at the end of 2020. The audio file purportedly has AstraZeneca’s CEO, Pascal Soriot admitting that there are people who should not be vaccinated.
‘And for those of you who may not be totally familiar with antibodies, you know, you have to know a number of people cannot be vaccinated, like if you have an immune disease, lupus or some other immune condition... or multiple sclerosis, you cannot be vaccinated.’
🪓 TRUTH: We Can’t Trust the Data Used for Approval
Whistleblower and former regional director for Ventavia Research Group, a company hired to run clinical trials for Pfizer’s COVID shot - Brook Jackson alleges to have witnessed deeply disturbing practices at trial sites that she affirms corrupted the data used by FDA to approve the Covid-19 injections.
The data that we were told to trust is allegedly tainted by unsanitary practices, absurdly unqualified staff and even forged informed consent forms. So, how can we trust the data?
Pfizer Whistleblower Exposes Rampant Clinical Trial Fraud
They said the Covid-19 injections would not leave injection site. That was wrong.
The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology published a pre-proof "Transplacental Transmission of the COVID-19 Vaccine mRNA: Evidence from Placental, Maternal and Cord Blood Analyses Post-Vaccination"(February 1, 2024):
The Children’s Health Defense Network explains the study:
“This study involved just two patients. Patient 1, a 34-year-old pregnant woman, received a Pfizer two-shot primary round and two boosters (one Pfizer, one Moderna), with the last dose administered two days before delivering by cesarean section. Investigators collected samples of her placenta, blood and cord blood post-delivery.
Patient 2 was 33 and received two Pfizer doses, the last 10 days before her vaginal delivery. Only placental samples were available from this patient.
Vaccine mRNA was detected in both placentas. Spike protein was found in the placenta of Patient 2 but not Patient 1. mRNA from the vaccine was found in the cord and maternal blood of Patient 1.”
🪓 TRUTH: The Covid-19 Vaccines Don’t Prevent Covid & Exhibit Negative Efficacy
In Pfizer’s September 2021 post-hoc analysis, Pfizer states that their mRNA injections increase the risk for COVID-19. Page 22 of the 2021 FDA Briefing Document states:
“An additional analysis appears to indicate that the incidence of COVID-19 generally increased in each group of study participants with increasing time post-Dose 2.”
According to a Cleveland Clinic study, the people who had the most shots had the greatest chance of contracting Covid-19.
The Science’ has now been established by the Cleveland Clinic. Genetic vaccines damage your immune system and make you not less likely but more likely to be infected with Covid.’
-The Expose
The Epoch Times reported on a paper published in the International Journal of Epidemiology which determined:
‘A single dose of the Pfizer vaccine was pegged at minus 121 percent effectiveness on day 84 and minus 85 percent effectiveness on day 98. A second Pfizer dose held up better, but still dipped below 50 percent at day 98.
A single dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine turned negative at day 70 and a second dose turned negative at day 84.’
“I’ve never seen a vaccine like this,” testified pediatric cardiologist Dr. Kirk Milhoan.
“The lowest risk for getting COVID is if you’ve had zero vaccines. As you add vaccines, your risk of getting COVID goes up. I’ve never seen a vaccine like this. That’s not the basis of vaccines. They shouldn't have what we would call negative efficacy.”
Share
Conclusion from Study: IgG4 Antibodies Induced by Repeated Vaccination May Generate Immune Tolerance to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein (published May 17, 2023):
“...evidence suggests that the reported increase in IgG4 levels detected after repeated vaccination with the mRNA vaccines may not be a protective mechanism; rather, it constitutes an immune tolerance mechanism to the spike protein that could promote unopposed SARS-CoV2 infection and replication by suppressing natural antiviral responses. Increased IgG4 synthesis due to repeated mRNA vaccination with high antigen concentrations may also cause autoimmune diseases and promote cancer growth and autoimmune myocarditis.”
“All in all, reviewed data indicate that IgG4 production induced by repeated vaccination does not in any way constitute a protective mechanism.”
Vaccines shouldn't cause an autoimmune response against your own healthy cells: 4.8.23.
What Dr. Pengilly said is in direct contradiction to the study below. He said ‘myocarditis is generally an autoimmune phenomenon where antibodies are formed against the cells, in this case the heart, and it occurs after Covid at a higher rate than it does after vaccination...’
The studies below conclude the virus doesn’t infect the heart. We have a right to question why what Dr. Pengilly said is the opposite of what these autopsies say. It’s necessary!
If SARS-CoV-2 infection caused myocarditis or inflammation of heart muscle tissue, then it would be seen on autopsy in fatal cases of COVID-19.
‘In the heart, SARS-CoV-2 positivity was found only in the endocardium and endothelium of a single case. Even though many have found the presence of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 to be consistent in the heart (especially in people with heart comorbidities), our results suggest that myocardial damage is not imputable to direct viral assault. The virus probably penetrates the heart, but the lack of cytopathic findings and the viral antigen negativity, observed by us as well as by others, indicates that the virus does not replicate within the heart, despite the presence of ACE-2 receptors that are, however, mainly expressed by endothelial cells.’
‘Poloni et al specifically examined the heart of fatal COVID-19 cases and concluded the virus does not infect the heart.’
🪓 TRUTH: Natural Immunity is Superior
People who recovered from COVID-19 were better off than those who received a COVID-19 vaccine.
Risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalization in individuals with natural, vaccine-induced and hybrid immunity: a retrospective population-based cohort study from Estonia